Volume 8, Issue 1 (Winter 2019)                   Arch Hyg Sci 2019, 8(1): 9-16 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Eslami F, Salari M, Dehghani M H, Dargahi A, Nazmara S, yazdani M et al . Relationship of Formaldehyde Concentration in Ambient Air with CO, NO2, O3, Temperature and Humidity: Modeling by Response Surface Model. Arch Hyg Sci 2019; 8 (1) :9-16
URL: http://jhygiene.muq.ac.ir/article-1-340-en.html
1- Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Jiroft University of Medical Sciences, Jiroft, Iran
2- Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Student Research Committee, Hamadan, Iran
3- Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4- Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Student Research Committee, Hamadan
5- Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran
6- Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:   (4035 Views)
Background & Aims of the Study: Exposure to formaldehyde in ambient air has attracted a great attention, due to harmful health effects. This study was aimed to determine formaldehyde concentration in winter and spring seasons, in Azadi square region, Tehran, and the relation of variations of CO, NO2, O3, temperature and humidity with formaldehyde concentration was modeled based on Response Surface Methodology.
Materials & Methods:  This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2014–2015 in Tehran. For measuring the formaldehyde concentration, NIOSH3500 method was employed. The concentration of formaldehyde was detected at 580 nm wavelengths by PerkinElmer LAMBDA spectrophotometer model of 25UV/Vis. Data of CO, NO2 and O3 concentration were attained from Tehran Air Quality Control Company. SPSS 16 and Design Expert (version 7) were used for analyzing data.
Results: Results showed the concentration of formaldehyde in the spring was on average 4.7 ppb more compared to winter season. The Model fitted for the prediction of formaldehyde showed a significant p-value (<0.001). Moreover, the R2 and Adj-R2 values were obtained about 0.8237 and 0.7607. In this model, it is observed the parameters of CO, NO2, O3 and temperature has a direct relation with the variations of formaldehyde, and humidity has an indirect relation.
Conclusions:  Results indicated formaldehyde concentration in spring season is on overage higher than winter spring. The fitted model showed the CO, NO2, O3 and temperature is in a direct correlation with formaldehyde changes in ambient air, and humidity is in an indirect correlation.
Full-Text [PDF 888 kb]   (909 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (764 Views)  
Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: Occuptional Health
Received: 2018/06/2 | Accepted: 2019/02/28 | Published: 2019/03/14

References
1. 1. Khamutian R, Najafi F, Soltanian M, Shokoohizadeh MJ, Dargahi A, Poorhaghighat S, Sharafi K, Afshari A. The association between air pollution and weather conditions with increase in the number of admissions of asthmatic patients in emergency wards: a case study in Kermanshah. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2015; 29: 229. Link
2. Yang X, Wang Y, Liu W, Zhang Y, Zheng F, Wang S, et al. A portable system for on-site quantification of formaldehyde in air based on G-quadruplex halves coupled with A smartphone reader. Biosens Bioelectron 2016;75:48-54. Link [DOI:10.1016/j.bios.2015.08.020]
3. Onyije F, Avwioro O. Excruciating effect of formaldehyde exposure to students in gross anatomy dissection laboratory. Int J Occup Environ Med 2012;3(2 ):113-21. Link
4. Hak C, Pundt I, Trick S, Kern C, Platt U, Dommen J, et al. Intercomparison of four different in-situ techniques for ambient formaldehyde measurements in urban air. Atmos Chem Phys 2005;5(11):2881-900. Link [DOI:10.5194/acp-5-2881-2005]
5. Grosjean D. Ambient levels of formaldehyde, acetaldehyde and formic acid in southern California: results of a one-year baseline study. Environ Sci Technol 1991;25(4):710-5. Link [DOI:10.1021/es00016a016]
6. Hoekman SK. Speciated measurements and calculated reactivities of vehicle exhaust emissions from conventional and reformulated gasolines. Environ Sci Technol 1992;26(6):1206-16. Link [DOI:10.1021/es50002a610]
7. Grosjean E, Williams EL, Grosjean D. Ambient levels of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde in Atlanta, Georgia. Air & Waste 1993;43(4):469-74. Link [DOI:10.1080/1073161X.1993.10467145]
8. Granby K, Christensen CS, Lohse C. Urban and semi-rural observations of carboxylic acids and carbonyls. Atmos Environ 1997;31(10):1403-15. Link [DOI:10.1016/S1352-2310(96)00347-0]
9. Wang L, Sakurai M, Kameyama H. Study of catalytic decomposition of formaldehyde on Pt/TiO2 alumite catalyst at ambient temperature. J Hazard Mater 2009;167(1-3):399-405. Link [DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.12.129]
10. Zhang Y, Liu X, McHale C, Li R, Zhang L, Wu Y, et al. Bone marrow injury induced via oxidative stress in mice by inhalation exposure to formaldehyde. PloS one 2013;8(9):e74974. Link [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0074974]
11. Ayers G, Gillett R, Granek H, De Serves C, Cox R. Formaldehyde production in clean marine air. Geophys Res Lett 1997;24(4):401-4. Link [DOI:10.1029/97GL00123]
12. Müller K. Determination of aldehydes and ketones in the atmosphere-a comparative long time study at an urban and a rural site in Eastern Germany. Chemosphere 1997;35(9):2093-106. Link [DOI:10.1016/S0045-6535(97)00267-1]
13. Organization WHO. Chapter 5.8 Formaldehyde. Air Quality Guidelines 2001.
14. Zhou K, Ji X, Zhang N, Zhang X. On-line monitoring of formaldehyde in air by cataluminescence-based gas sensor. Sens Actuators B Chem 2006;119(2):392-7. Link [DOI:10.1016/j.snb.2005.12.038]
15. Cerón-Bretón J, Cerón-Bretón R, Kahl J, Ramírez-Lara E, Guarnaccia C, Aguilar-Ucán C, et al. Diurnal and seasonal variation of BTEX in the air of Monterrey, Mexico: preliminary study of sources and photochemical ozone pollution. Air Qual Atmos Health 2015;8(5):469-82. Link [DOI:10.1007/s11869-014-0296-1]
16. Ciobanu C-I, Bugheanu A-M, Ciobanu RC, editors. The influence of the public passenger transport system on the quality of urban life. Study case: Bucharest. Proceedings of the International Management Conference; 2015. Link
17. Andreini BP, Baroni R, Galimberti E, Sesana G. Aldehydes in the atmospheric environment: evaluation of human exposure in the north-west area of Milan. Microchem J 2000;67(1-3):11-9. Link [DOI:10.1016/S0026-265X(00)00087-4]
18. Possanzini M, Di Palo V, Cecinato A. Sources and photodecomposition of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde in Rome ambient air. Atmos Environ 2002;36(19):3195-201. Link [DOI:10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00192-9]
19. Sin DW, Wong Y-C, Louie PK. Trends of ambient carbonyl compounds in the urban environment of Hong Kong. Atmos Environ 2001;35(34):5961-9. Link [DOI:10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00359-4]
20. Báez A, Padilla H, Cervantes J, Pereyra D, Torres M, Garcia R, et al. Preliminary study of the determination of ambient carbonyls in Xalapa City, Veracruz, Mexico. Atmos Environ 2001;35(10):1813-9. Link [DOI:10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00475-1]
21. Mohamed MF, Kang D, Aneja VP. Volatile organic compounds in some urban locations in United States. Chemosphere 2002;47(8):863-82. Link [DOI:10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00107-8]
22. Seo Y-K, Baek S-O. Characterization of carbonyl compounds in the ambient air of an industrial city in Korea. Sensors 2011;11(1):949-63. Link [DOI:10.3390/s110100949]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Archives of Hygiene Sciences

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb